The Domestic Violence Act: Constitutional Perspectives

An attempt is made to primarily looks into the provisions with this Act from the constitutional perspective – the essential rights to become particular. The primary aim of the commentary is to bring to light the countless rights, most of which are constitutionally guaranteed, of women who are protected directly or indirectly by this Act. The all-encompassing nature with the legislation is elucidated among the other strengths of this law. The Act is thus a very vital little bit of legislation from the feminist perspective of law. However one of the primary and primary criticisms of the writers is the fact that this Act intentionally or unintentionally neglects to deal with the issue of child abuse among male children. This persisting problem being previously left without any

Introduction
Domestic violence is sadly a fact in Indian society, a truism. In the Indian patriarchal setup, it became a satisfactory practice to abuse women. There may be many reasons for the occurrence of domestic violence. Originating from a feminist standpoint, it could be declared that the occurrence of domestic violence against women arises straight from the patriarchal setup, the stereotyping of gender roles, and the distribution of power, real or perceived, in society. Following such ideology, men are considered to be stronger than women and more powerful. They control females and their lives and for that reason of this power play, they may hurt women with impunity. The role of the woman is to accept her ‘fate’ and therefore the violence employed against her meekly.

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (or the Domestic Violence Act) can be described as laudable piece of legislation that had been enacted in 2005 to tackle this problem. The Act theoretically goes considerably towards protection of women in the domestic setup. It does not take first substantial step up the direction of vanquishing the questionable public/private distinction traditionally maintained in the law, which has been challenged by feminists over and over again. Admittedly, women could earlier approach the Courts within the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the event of domestic violence. However, the types of domestic violence contemplated by this Act, and the victims recognised because of it, make it more expansive in scope than the IPC. The IPC not used at all the term domestic violence to consult this objectionable practice. Actually, the only similar class of offences addressed through the IPC addressed cruelty to married women. All other cases of domestic violence within the household would have to be dealt with under the offences that this respective acts of violence constituted under the IPC with virtually no regard to the gender from the victim. This posed a problem especially where the victims were children or women who were determined by the assailant. Actually, even where the victim was the wife from the assailant and might approach the Courts under S.498A of the IPC, she would presumably have to move out of her matrimonial where you can ensure her safety or face further violence as retaliation. There was clearly no measure available to permit her to continue residing in her matrimonial home nevertheless raise her voice resistant to the violence perpetrated against her. This, in addition to a great many other problems faced by women in the household, prompted this enactment. This commentary concentrates on the constitutional perspectives on this progressive legislation.                                  
Review of Important Provisions

The Act, in a very bold break from prior legislations, gives a very expansive definition towards the term “domestic violence”, a term hitherto not really used in legal parlance. Domestic violence is defined in a comprehensive means by S.3 from the Act, comprising                  
# physical, mental, verbal, emotional, sexual and economic abuse,                                                
# harassment for dowry,                                                                                                                    
# acts of threatening to abuse the victim or other person associated with her.                                

The Act thus deals with forms of abuse that have been either not addressed earlier, or that were addressed in ways not as broad as done here. As an illustration, it provides in its ambit sexual abuse like marital rape which, though excluded within the IPC, very easily legally recognised as being a kind of abuse under the definition of sexual abuse within this Act. The meaning also encompasses claims for compensation arising from domestic violence and includes maintenance comparable to that provided for under S.125 in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Nevertheless, the claim for compensation is not limited to maintenance as allowed by that provision. It is noteworthy that this maintenance available under it should be in correspondence with the lifestyle with the aggrieved party. Lastly, the Act identifies emotional abuse as a form of domestic violence, including insults on account of the victim’s without having any children or male children.

Constitutional Perspectives                                                                                                           
The enactment in question was passed by the Parliament with recourse to Article 253 of the Constitution. This provision confers on the Parliament the power to create laws in pursuance of international treaties, conventions, etc. The Domestic Violence Act was passed in furtherance with the recommendations from the United Nations Committee on the CEDAW. The Act encompasses all of the provisions with the Specific Recommendations which form a part of General Recommendation no.19, 1992.

Protection of Women and Fundamental Rights                                                                          
The Statement of Objects and Reasons declares that the Act had been passed keeping in view the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 and 21. Article 21 confers the legal right to life and liberty in negative terms, stating that it may not be taken away except by procedure established by law, which is required, as a result of judicial decisions, to be fair, just and reasonable. The right to life continues to be held to incorporate the following rights (which can be reflected in the Act), among others:

1. The legal right to be free from violence: In Francis Coralie Mullin v. Union Territory Delhi, Administrator , the Supreme Court stated, any act which damages or injures or interferes with the use of any limb or faculty of a person, either permanently as well as temporarily, will be within the inhibition of Article 21.                                                                                                
This right is incorporated in the Act with the meaning of physical abuse, which constitutes domestic violence (and is hence punishable within the Act). Physical abuse is said to incorporate acts or conduct of such nature that they cause bodily pain, harm, or danger one’s, limb or health, or impair medical or development of the aggrieved person . In addition to this, the Act also includes similar acts of assault and certain acts of assault as envisaged in the Indian Penal Code inside the meaning of domestic violence. By adoption of such an expansive definition, the Act protects the proper of women against violence.

2. The legal right to dignity: In Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan , the Supreme Court emphasised the belief that the legal right to life included in its ambit the right to accept human dignity, basing its opinion on a host of cases that had been decided in favour of this proposition. The right to dignity would come with the right against being subjected to humiliating sexual acts. It would also include the best against being insulted. These two areas of the right to life find mention under the definitions of sexual abuse and emotional abuse, respectively. A praiseworthy aspect of the legislation may be the very conception of emotional abuse as being a form of domestic violence. The recognition of sexual abuse of the wife by the husband being a kind of violation to the person is creditable, especially as such sexual abuse just isn’t recognised by the IPC as an offence. These acts would fall inside domestic violence as envisaged through the Act, although the definition would not be restricted to it.

3. The legal right to shelter: In Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. , it was held that the right to life would come with the right to shelter, distinguishing the matter at hand from Gauri Shankar v. Union of India in which the question had related to eviction of the tenant within a statute. Ss. 6 and 17 from the Domestic Violence Act reinforce this right. Under S.6, it is a duty of the Protection Officer to provide the aggrieved party accommodation where the party doesn’t have place of accommodation, on request by such party or otherwise. Under S.17, the party’s right to continue staying in the shared household is protected. These provisions thereby enable women to make use of various protections directed at them without any fear of being left homeless.
Article 14 provides the equal protection clause. It affirms equality prior to the law as well as the equal protection of the laws. Article 14 prohibits class legislation , but permits classification for legislative purposes. A law does not become unconstitutional due to the fact it pertains to one set of persons and not another. Where a law effects a classification and is challenged to be violative want to know ,, the law may be declared valid if it satisfies these two conditions:

1. The classification must be depending on some intelligible differentia,

2. There must be a rational nexus between this differentia and also the object sought to become achieved through the law.

As a result of the ruling in the event for example Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu , any law that is arbitrary is considered violative of Article 14 at the same time. This provision is significant in placing a stop to arbitrariness from the exercise of State power as well as in making certain no citizen is subjected to any discrimination. At the same time, it preserves the State’s power to legislate for any specific class of people.

Article 15 disallows discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, sex, race, etc., but permits the State to make special provisions for many classes of persons, including as well as children.
The Domestic Violence Act promotes the rights of women guaranteed under Articles 14 and 15. Domestic violence is but one among several factors that hinder women in their progress, and this Act seeks to safeguard them from this evil. It indeed effects a classification between men and women, protecting only women from domestic violence, but this classification is founded while on an intelligible differential, namely, gender, and in addition has a rational nexus with all the object of the Act. Further, the Act is far from arbitrary, in that it’s a well-thought and necessary make an effort to curtail domestic violence and finally vanquish it. It’s to become remembered that it must be generally women who are the victims of domestic violence, rather than men. During this period, it is also necessary to bear in mind Article 15(3) which empowers the State to make legislations such as this for the benefit of women, thus creating the best within their favour against the

The place that the Act Fails                                                                                                            
The Act could play a stellar role in protection of women’s rights in the household and in guarding them from domestic violence. In the initial instance, a recognition of domestic violence as something unacceptable, where it has become just one more social practice, is necessary as well as, commendable inside a patriarchal society. Having recognised the rights of women and also the violation of these rights, the next phase taken is providing innovative and efficacious remedies to enforce exactly the same. The conceptualization of the Act so far is admirable.
However, a very important factor that the writers feel is amiss in the Act would be the fact it brushes aside male children. Though you will find interpretations towards the contrary, it does not take opinion from the writers that the Act does not extend its protection to male children. Firstly, an aggrieved person as defined by the Act, is a woman who’s, or has been around a domestic relationship with the respondent . While the Act does define a child as any person below age of eighteen years, the meaning of domestic violence itself refers at all stages and then an aggrieved person and never to a child; really the only relevant place in which a child is mentioned is S.18(c), where it is known that the Magistrate may pass a protection order restraining the respondent from entering the institution of the child the location where the aggrieved person is a child. It is the opinion of the writers until this by itself is not sufficient to construe the Act as applicable to male children as well.

Arguably, it may be declared that the Act was passed to cater to the needs of women and not boys. After all, the particular title with the Act indicates that many experts have enacted to safeguard the rights of females. Yet, it has to be kept in mind that domestic violence, though predominantly faced by women, whether they are wives, mothers, sisters or daughters, is also aimed against male children sometimes. It appears an undesirable excuse to express that male children should not be provided readily available respite from domestic violence simply because of their gender. Regardless of whether other forms of violence could be adequately addressed from the IPC (though this hardly seems the situation), it’s true that this sexual abuse of male children can’t be redressed in almost any apposite manner by it. Reference could possibly be had to the Sakshi case , as well as the subsequent 172nd Law Commission report, where it was argued, amongst other things, that the offence of rape as addressed in the IPC be defined in gender-neutral terms, in order that the protection could be extended to male children at the same time. This was necessary keeping in mind the increased and increasing cases of sexual abuse of children, men and women. Once it really is acceded that male children are affected as much by sexual abuse by female children, it requires to be accepted that they need to be protected from such abuse inside the “private” sphere too. On the face from it, there appears to be no concrete reason behind denying male children protection from

Evaluation
The Act, by and large, is a valuable piece of legislation. Its shortcomings don’t, on final analysis, blot out the immense help the Act could be of to women. A good thing concerning the Act is the fact that it deals with domestic violence regardless of the religion of the parties, as numerous a period wrongs are perpetrated (ab)using the protection afforded by personal laws. It really is thus secular in outlook in protecting women’s rights. It also does take up for consideration child sexual abuse, though in a limited sense (male children being excluded from the purview), at any given time in the event the practice is becoming rampant. The authors further consider it desirable to increase the Act and permit its application to male children who are also affected by domestic violence, thinking about the nature of the practice, and recommend such an extension. While stating that the Act is protected by Article 15(3) from being considered discriminatory, it might help to recollect until this provision creates an exception in favour of as well as children, and thus could be made use of to warrant the extension of the Act to male children as well. Indeed, it might seem logical to take action.

It’s, however, opined that it must be too soon to predict the usefulness of this legislations to its target beneficiaries and also the society as a whole. It needs to be seen perhaps the practicality of the Act has been ensured through the legislature together with the responsibility of implementation is based on

FREE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HELPLINE

&

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAWYERS

KEWAL NIRMAL KALSI SALUTARY TRUST

[SERVICE PROVIDERS]

18 East-lane Sundarpur, House No. 5,  P.O.Dispur, Guwahati-781005, Assam, India.

e-mail:  mail4u2dear@gmail.com    or    mail@lawyersconsortium.com

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOT LINE:  9 8 6 4 0 4 7 8 8 6

**********

FOR

DIVORCE LAWYERS

CONSORTIUM OF LAWYERS’

18 East-lane Sundarpur, House No. 5,  P.O.Dispur, Guwahati-781005, Assam, India.

Web-site:   http://lawyersconsortium.com